Timothy H. Heaton
Department of Earth Sciences
University of South Dakota
Vermillion, South Dakota 57069
Sandra L. Talbot and Gerald F. Shields
Institute of Arctic Biology
University of Alaska,
Fairbanks, Alaska 99775, USA
ABSTRACT
Until recently the prehistory of the Alexander Archipelago has been the subject of much speculation but little study. Archaeologists have considered it a possible route for human travel to the New World--a route that would have circumvented the great ice sheets of Canada (Heusser, 1960; Fladmark, 1979, 1983; Dixon, 1993). But geologists and biologists have traditionally discounted the possibility of habitable areas in the archipelago during glacial maxima (Prest, 1969; Nasmith, 1970; Klein, 1965). The controversy has centered around the question of whether non-glaciated refugia existed, with access to marine food sources, that were large enough to support populations of large mammals, including humans. Studies on modern and fossil bears from the Alexander Archipelago are providing the first conclusive evidence that such refugia existed (Fig. 1).
David R. Klein (1965:7) began his historic paper on the mammal distributions of the Alexander Archipelago with the following declaration:
| During the Wisconsin glaciation the present land areas of the coastal regions of Alaska bordering the Gulf of Alaska were virtually completely overridden by ice. The now existing flora and fauna of the region have presumably become established in the 10,000 years since the recession of the ice. . . . The present distribution of mammals in this region, although complicated by the phenomenon of insularity, reflects the sequence of their arrival and their relationship to specific refugia. |
| The failure of brown bears to occupy the islands south of Frederick Sound when access became available may be a result of prior occupancy by the black bear. A previously established species obviously has an advantage over a similar form attempting to occupy the same ecological niche. |
| 1) Island colonization was easier in early postglacial times due to ice bridges and/or lower sea level. |
| 2) Some species survived in the archipelago during glaciation and thereafter had to endure changing climate and/or competition with invading species from the mainland. |
Klein (1965) rejected the second explanation for large mammals but specifically invoked the first, especially for bears. New data now suggest that the second explanation may be more accurate.
On Your Knees Cave is located in the extreme northwest corner of Prince of Wales Island adjacent to Sumner Strait (Heaton, 1995a; Fig. 1). Seal remains from the cave date near the peak of Fraser (late Wisconsin) Glaciation, suggesting that the area was ice free (Table 2). Remains of brown and black bear from On Your Knees Cave date to the period preceding Fraser Glaciation, called the Olympia Nonglacial Interval in British Columbia (Fig. 2). Since brown bears apparently did not reach the lower 48 states until about 12,000 years ago (Kurten and Anderson, 1980; Mustoe and Carlstad, 1995), their early presence in the Alexander Archipelago is surprising. This suggests that, at least for bears, the glaciated coastal islands were less inhibitive to travel than was mainland North America.
Stable carbon isotope values on fossil bones give an indication of an animal's diet. The brown bear from On Your Knees Cave has the highest value of any bear analyzed from the islands thus far (Table 2), and this indicates an unusually large marine component to the animal's diet (Fry and Sherr, 1984; Heaton, 1995b). However, the black bear from that cave has a low isotopic value typical of black bears, and this indicates a primarily terrestrial diet (Bocherens et al., 1994). Marine feeders in the archipelago, such as brown bears and otters, would likely have a great advantage in surviving periods of glaciation, and this must be kept in mind when considering theories of continuous habitation.
Devil's Canopy Cave on Prince of Wales Island has also produced a mammalian fauna predating Fraser Glaciation, though only rodents have been recovered thus far (Heaton, 1995a). The most significant find is marmot, Marmota sp., an animal not currently found on the island or in postglacial deposits. The only sample analyzed from the cave is beyond the range of radiocarbon dating (Table 2), so unfortunately the glacial context is unknown. This cave suggests the possibility that fossil deposits in the archipelago could have survived multiple glaciation events. Field work over the next several years will focus on these older deposits in hopes of obtaining a complete faunal record for the last 50,000 years.
The DNA sequences suggest two very distinct clades for Ursus arctos, one composed exclusively of brown bears from Admiralty, Baranof, and Chichagof Islands (ABC Islands) of the northern Alexander Archipelago (Fig. 1) and another comprising all other populations (Talbot and Shields, 1996; Fig. 3). The brown bears of the ABC Islands are fixed for a minimum of 27 point mutations of which two are transversions in the cytochrome b gene alone. This suggests long-term isolation (550,000-700,000 years) from other populations of brown bears (Talbot and Shields, 1996; Shields and Kocher, 1991; Cronin et al., 1991)). This long-term isolation is also apparent when the DNAs of ABC bears are compared with those of more than 300 brown bears from throughout their world-wide range (Waits et al., 1996). The most logical explanation for these results is that the bears of the ABC Islands are the relic of an invasion of Ursus arctos from Asia into Alaska prior to the Fraser Glaciation. This invasion may never have extended beyond Alaska, and apparently it died out (except in the Alexander Archipelago) prior to the more extensive postglacial invasion (Figs. 2 and 3).
The mitochondrial data also suggest that the polar bear is the closest extant relative of the ABC Island bears (Talbot and Shields, 1996; Taberlet and Bouvet, 1992). Kurten suggested from fossil evidence that polar bears arose from a coastal form of brown bear possibly in northeastern Siberia (Kurten, 1964, 1968), and our data are consistent with this. However, our novel observation of paraphyly of brown bears with respect to polar bears will have to be tested using other genetic markers, including those of nuclear genes, before a full analysis can be made.
This combination of paleontological and genetic evidence offers strong documentation for habitable coastal refugia in the Alexander Archipelago during the latest glaciation event. The fossil record even demonstrates that brown bears had a more extensive range in the islands than at present--both before and after the last glacial maximum. This suggests the possibility that glaciation may have actually promoted rather than inhibited coastal range extension by brown bears. The combination of marine foods and ice bridges may have provided a coastal corridor for this species not available in interglacial or postglacial times. This suggests that at least some unglaciated land was always available for denning and food supplement, and other species of mammals may have survived glaciation in such refugia as well.
Figures 4 and 5 contrast two models of mammal invasion of new island habitat following glaciation. The theory of postglacial colonization of the Alexander Archipelago from the Alaska mainland, advocated by Klein (1965), can be termed the Inland Colonization Model (Fig. 4). It may still be the best explanation for many island mammals, but it can no longer be applied exclusively. The theory outlined in this paper for brown bears can be termed the Coastal Colonization Model (Fig. 5; Heaton, 1995c). It now provides the best explanation for brown bears, and it may also apply to black bears and other mammalian species.
As Calvin J. Heusser (1960) stated at the end of his book on Late Pleistocene North America, no discussion of this topic is complete without considering humans. A recent linguistic study reached conclusions strikingly similar to ours, namely that coastal southern Alaska housed an isolated refugium during the last glaciation (Rogers et al., 1991). While our study provides no direct evidence of human antiquity in the Alexander Archipelago, the evidence from brown bears furnishes a close analog. Humans and brown bears are both omnivores and have similar habitat requirements. If marine foods and coastal den sites were available for Ursus arctos, then the minimum requirements for seafaring Homo sapiens were almost certainly available.
Banfield, A. W. F. 1961. A revision of the reindeer and caribou, genus Rangifer. National Museum of Canada Bulletin 177, 1-137.
Bocherens, H., Fizet, M., and Mariotti, A. 1994. Diet, physiology and ecology of fossil mammals as inferred from stable carbon and nitrogen isotope biogeochemistry: implications for Pleistocene bears. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 107, 213-225.
Cowan, I. M. 1989. Birds and mammals on the Queen Charlotte Islands. In "The Outer Shores" (G. G. E. Scudder and N. Gessler, Eds.) pp. 175-186. Queen Charlotte Islands Museum Press.
Cowan, I. M., and Guiguet, C. J. 1965. "The Mammals of British Columbia." British Columbia Provincial Museum Handbook 11, 3rd ed.
Cronin, M., Amstrup, S. C., Garner, G. W., and Vyse, E. R. 1991. Interspecific and intraspecific mitochondrial DNA variation in North American bears (Ursus). Canadian Journal of Zoology 69, 2985-2992.
Dixon, E. J. 1993. "Quest for the Origin of the First Americans." University of New Mexico Press.
Fladmark, K. R. 1979. Routes: alternative migration corridors for early Man in North America. American Antiquities 44, 55-69.
Fry, B., and Sherr, E. B. 1984. ë13C measurements as indicators of carbon flow in marine and freshwater ecosystems. Contributions in Science 27, 13-47.
Hall, E. R. 1981. "The Mammals of North America." John Wiley, New York, ed 2.
Heaton, T. H. 1995a. Middle Wisconsin bear and rodent remains discovered on Prince of Wales Island, Alaska. Current Research in the Pleistocene 12.
Heaton, T. H. 1995b. Interpretation of ë13C values from vertebrate remains of the Alexander Archipelago, southeast Alaska. Current Research in the Pleistocene 12.
Heaton, T. H. 1995c. Colonization of southeast Alaska by Ursus arctos prior to the peak of Wisconsin glaciation. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 15, 34A.
Heaton, T. H., and Grady, F. 1992. Preliminary report on the fossil bears of El Capitan Cave, Prince of Wales Island, Alaska. Current Research in the Pleistocene 9, 97-99.
Heaton, T. H., and Grady, F. 1993. Fossil grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) from Prince of Wales Island, Alaska, offer new insights into animal dispersal, interspecific competition, and age of deglaciation. Current Research in the Pleistocene 10, 98-100.
Heaton, T. H., and Love, D. C., 1995. The 1994 excavation of a Quaternary vertebrate fossil deposit from Bumper Cave, Prince of Wales Island, Alaska. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 27, no. 3, 57.
Heusser, C. J. 1960. "Late Pleistocene environments of north Pacific North America." Special Publication of the American Geographical Society 35.
Kimura, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitution through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16, 111-120.
Klein, D. R. 1965. Postglacial distribution patterns of mammals in the southern coastal regions of Alaska. Arctic 18, 7-20.
Kurten, B. 1964. The evolution of the polar bear, Ursus maritimus Phipps. Acta Zoologica Fennica 108, 1-30.
Kurten, B. 1968. "Pleistocene Mammals of Europe." Weidenfeld and Nicolsom, London.
Kurten, B., and Anderson, E. 1980. "Pleistocene Mammals of North America." Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
Mustoe, G. E., and Carlstad, C. A. 1995. A late Pleistocene brown bear (Ursus arctos) from northwest Washington. Northwest Science 69, 106-113.
Nasmith, H. W. 1970. Pleistocene geology of the Queen Charlotte Islands and southern British Columbia. In "Early Man and Environments in Northwestern North America" (J. W. Smith and R. H. Smith, Eds.), pp. 5-9. University of Calgary Archaeological Association.
Prest, V. K. 1969. Retreat of Wisconsin and Recent ice in North America. Geological Survey of Canada Map 1257A.
Rausch, R. L. 1969. Origin of the Terrestrial Mammalian Fauna of the Kodiak Archipelago. In "The Kodiak Island Refugium: its Geology, Flora, Fauna and History" (T. N. V. Karlstrom and G. E. Ball, Eds.), pp. 216-234. Boreal Institute, University of Alberta, Ryerson Press.
Rogers, R. A., Rogers, L. A., Hoffmann, R. S., and Martin, L. D. 1991. Native American biological diversity and the biographic influence of ice age refugia. Journal of Biogeography 18, 623-630.
Shields, G. F., and Kocher, T. D. 1991. Phylogenetic relationships of North American ursids based on analysis of mitochondrial DNA. Evolution, 45, 218-221.
Taberlet, P., and Bouvet, J. 1992. Genetique de l'ours brun des Pyrenees (Ursus arctos): premiers resultats. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 314, 15-21.
Talbot, S. L., and Shields, G. F. In press. Phylogeography of brown bears (Ursus arctos) of Alaska and paraphyly within the Ursidae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.
Waits, L., Kohn, M., Talbot, S. L., Shields, G. F., Taberlet, P., P„„bo, S., and Ward, R. In press. Mitochondrial phylogeography in brown bears (Ursus arctos) and Pleistocene climatic fluctuations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science.
Fig. 2. Time line of interpreted events in southeast Alaska from 50,000 years B.P. to the present. The early invasion of bears is represented by the fossils of On Your Knees Cave and the living brown bears of the ABC Islands. Mainland bears represent the later invasion. The affinity of the postglacial bears of the southern archipelago has not yet been determined, but their early fossil record at El Capitan Cave and other sites suggests that they may also represent the early invasion.
Fig. 3. Neighbor-joining tree for the major lineages of brown bears and polar bears based on complete sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene and analyzed by the Kimura (1980) two parameter distance model. DNA sequence from the cytochrome b gene of a sun bear (Helarctos {= Ursus} malayanus) was used as an out-group reference.
Fig. 4. Idealized diagrams of southeast Alaska during and following Fraser Glaciation illustrating the Inland Colonization Model advocated by Klein (1965). Under this model there were no glacial survivors in the Alexander Archipelago, and the mainland and island populations have a postglacial common ancestry.
Fig. 5. Idealized diagrams of southeast Alaska during and following Fraser Glaciation illustrating the Coastal Colonization Model presented for Ursus arctos in this paper. Under this model the mainland and island populations have a separate glacial and postglacial history and are therefore more distinct genetically.
Table 1. List of limestone caves from which vertebrate remains have been recovered in the southern Alexander Archipelago indicating the minimum number of individuals (MNI) recovered of brown bears (Ursus arctos) and black bears (U. americanus). Only El Capitan Cave and Bumper Cave have been thoroughly excavated thus far. The first six caves listed contain only postglacial remains. On Your Knees Cave contains bears that predate Fraser Glaciation as well as other remains of glacial and postglacial age. The list of other vertebrate remains recovered is not exhaustive and excludes micromammals. Note that black bears, river otters (Lutra canadensis), and fish (mostly tide pool species eaten by otters) are commonly associated in coastal caves (den sites) but are not found at higher elevations. Brown bear remains are found in caves at all elevations.
Table 2. List of radiocarbon dates and associated stable carbon isotope values obtained thus far from vertebrate fossils in the southern Alexander Archipelago. The caves are located on northern Prince of Wales Island unless otherwise indicated (Fig. 1)