Library Tutorials
Red Line

Evaluating Web Resources

Due to the vast amount of information arriving on the World Wide Web daily, it is necessary for researchers to apply the same critical thinking skills to searching the Internet as they would apply to written resources.

Information may be used to deceive, to sway, to sell and to hurt. Your responsibility is to detect such practices and handle them appropriately as you conduct your research. By applying critical thinking skills, you can avoid being lead astray by biased, false, or misleading information.

Information located on the Internet is unmonitored. The creation of a homepage and the information found there can be done by anyone. Since there is no governing body overseeing the indexing and/or abstracting material found on the Internet, it is difficult to judge the quality of the information.

The chart below provides a process whereby the researcher may evaluate the information found on the Internet. An additional checklist is also available from the Library Information Kiosks, from the Information Literacy Coordinator, or is available for printing online at http://www.usd.edu/library/instruction/Checklist-WWW.htm

Further assistance is available from the Reference Desk.

Useful information on evaluation of Web Resources

Evaluating Information Found on the Internet - http://milton.mse.jhu.edu:8001/research/education/net.html

Evaluating Quality on the Web (Hope Tillman) - http://www.tiac.net/users/hope/findqual.html

How to Search the Web: A Guide to Search Tools - http://daphne.palomar.edu/TGSEARCH/

Tips for Evaluating a World Wide Web Search - http://www.uflib.ufl.edu/hss/ref/tips.html

Evaluation Process

Some facts

Web Publications

+

-

  • If you take the time to dig, there are excellent sites and databases available through government, education, and research sources. Their information is verified.
  • Subject directories usually do review & select the sites they include.
  • Anyone can create & "publish" anything - there are no publishers therefore no company's reputation is on the line.
  • For the majority of surface sites found there is no one "in charge" - there are no editors to review and/or select; there are no fact checkers to verify data.

Types of Search Services

Directories - (Yahoo, Infomine, Argus Clearinghouse, etc.) Selection criteria vary from service to service; has a tendency to use dated information, not taking into account new resources (pages may no longer exist or have moved).

Free Databases - (Grateful Med, NASA, etc.) Access is sometimes difficult without knowing the URL; many government sites maintain useful, free databases.

Meta-search Engines - (MetaFind, Profusion, Dogpile, etc.) will search multiple individual search engines at once.

Natural Language Search Engine - (Ask Jeeves, etc.) will search using natural language including statements or questions.

Search Engines - (AltaVistaGoogle, etc.) use spiders, crawlers, and bots to seek out pages; selection criteria is not evaluative; in some cases selection is dependent upon accessibility of a particular server; distinguished types of information by file extension only; retrieves records from its own archives (pages may no exist on Web any longer).

Specialized (subscription) Databases - (Lexis-Nexis, UMI Proquest, ERIC, etc.) fee-based databases covering general and specialized fields; reviewed, selected, and published like books and periodicals.

Criteria for Evaluation

Following are the main areas of a Web site (page) that need examination. Are these questions answerable? If not, maybe you should rethink your use of this resource for research purposes.

Content
  • What is the depth of coverage?

  • Is there a Table of Contents?

  • Are there appropriate links to related sources?

  • Does the information seem accurate?

  • Are there citations to other works?

  • Are there facts you could try to verify?

Point of View/Objectivity

  • Who is the intended audience?

  • Is there obvious bias?

  • Is the page nothing more than a marketing tool?

  • What level of audience is it designed for?

Authority

  • Who is responsible for the page?

  • Is the author affiliated with an organization?

  • Is the organization reputable?

  • Are the authors credentials available?

Accuracy
  • Is the information up-to-date?

  • Is the information free of errors?

  • Is the information reliable?

Currency

  • When was the page written?

  • When was the page first placed on the Web?

  • When was the page last revised?

  • Is the content of the work kept up-to-date?

  • Are dates provided for when the page was:

    • first created?

    • placed on the Web?

    • last revised?

  • Does the page load properly?

  • Are there dead links?

  • Is the Web page easy to navigate?

  • Is the Web page stable?

Visual Argument

  • Is there an emotional or cultural content in the visual argument?

  • Is additional information conveyed by the layout?

  • Is information missing from the visual argument?

Trustworthy Guides/Directories

Domains Geographical codes ( some examples)
.gov U.S. government .us United States
.mil U.S. defense department .ca Canada
.edu educational institutions .uk United Kingdom
.org nonprofit organizations .jp Japan
.com commercial company .it Italy
.net network of computers .au Australia
.de Germany

 


No Frames Version
Send Comments to weeksref@usd.edu
Last Modified: January 09, 2002
Visitor # 5,462nd since 07/30/00
Maintained by I.D. Weeks Library
The University of South Dakota
414 East Clark St
Vermillion, SD 57069