Table of Contents- Lesson 1 ) (Next) (Glossary)

TESTING FOR GENETIC DISORDERS

CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS

There is a large number of multiple congenital anomaly (MCA) syndromes whose diagnosis is based on gestalt-a clinical impression that quickly comes to mind on seeing the patient. The diagnosis of achondroplasia, for instance, rests solely on the clinical examination that may include anthropometric measurements and x-rays. There are no biochemical tests needed for confirmation.

When making a clinical diagnosis, problems arise in situations where there is a continuum between the normal and abnormal phenotypes. Autosomal dominant traits can be mild, moderate, or severe. On the mild end of the spectrum, the diagnosis can be questionable. For this reason, criteria have been established for the diagnosis of certain disorders. As an example, the diagnosis of neurofibromatosis requires two or more of the following features: six or more cafe-au-lait spots greater than 5 mm in diameter, axillary freckling, two or more neurofibromas or one plexiform neurofibroma, optic glioma (tumor within the eye), Lisch nodules (small tumors on the iris), bone lesions, or a first degree relative with neurofibromatosis. Often observation over time is required to establish a diagnosis. Included in Appendix D is a fact sheet on NF discussing diagnosis, genetic counseling and follow-up. Fact sheets are useful for patient reference and for understanding the need for follow-up care.

SCREENING TESTS

When available, laboratory tests can be invaluable in establishing a diagnosis or identifying individuals who carry genes coding for adult onset dominant or recessive genetic conditions. Screening tests for specific genetic disorders have as their primary goal early diagnosis which makes timely treatment or prevention possible. Newborn screening for PKU is a well known example of a screening test. Phenylketonuria has an incidence of 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 15,000. If untreated, 95% of affected individuals will develop moderate to severe mental retardation. With dietary restriction of phenylalanine, virtually all patients with PKU will be mentally normal.

The Guthrie test (bacterial inhibition assay) is one of the tests used to determine the phenylalanine level in the blood. Blood on filter paper is placed on agar plates with a strain of bacillus subtilis that requires phenylalanine for growth. The presence of growth is indicated by a halo surrounding the filter paper. If positive, blood phenylalanine and tyrosine levels are determined, and if elevated, a confirmatory assay for phenylalanine hydroxylase is done. Since phenylalanine is an essential amino acid (not produced by the body and comes from dietary sources), it is essential for a baby to be fed prior to testing. Ideally this test should be done on the second or third day of life. It is important to realize that this test is a screening test done to identify elevated phenylalanine levels. It is not diagnostic, as hyperphenylalaninemia can be reversible, transient, or secondary to an elevated level of tyrosine, or other variants unrelated to classic PKU. In PKU the phenylalanine level is usually 20-40 mg/dl in comparison with normal levels of 4-6 mg/dl. On the average, 1 in 20 babies with positive screens will have classic PKU. PKU is one of the single gene disorders that can be diagnosed based on the presence of an elevated precursor protein or substrate.

Newborn screening programs are usually sponsored by the state and include tests for such conditions as PKU (Guthrie test), galactosemia (transferase assay), congenital hypothyroidism (T4, TSH determination), and hemoglobinopathies such as sickle cell anemia (isoelectric focusing or DNA diagnosis).

Prenatal screening, specifically maternal serum alpha fetoprotein (MSAFP) screening or amniotic fluid chromosome analysis, seeks to identify fetal pathology. The level of MSAFP is elevated in neural tube defects (NTDs) and low in certain chromosomal disorders. Since around 95% of NTDs occur in families with a negative family history and since NTDs and chromosome anomalies are serious disorders, MSAFP screening is now considered standard of care. This is further discussed in Lesson 3 on Genetic Services.

Alpha fetoprotein is made in the fetal liver and finds its way through the placenta to the maternal circulation. MSAFP determination is done in mid-trimester (15-20 weeks gestation). The level of MSAFP increases with gestational age, so the test result is expressed in multiples of the median (MoM) with 1 MoM considered normal, 0.5 MoM half of normal, and 2.5 MoM 2 1/2 times normal.

It is important to emphasize that MSAFP is a screening test. The increase in MSAFP that occurs with NTDs is presumably dependent upon the size of the lesion. For this reason, the MSAFP level in the normal population overlaps the MSAFP level in the NTD population.



Fig. 1.19. MSAFP level in the normal and NTD populations

An arbitrary cutoff point has been drawn at 2.5 MoM. Values of 2.5 MoM or more are considered elevated (to the right of the dashed line). Any value less than 2.5 MoM is considered normal (to the left of the dashed line). Clearly, problems arise where the two populations overlap resulting in false positive (and patient anxiety) and false negative (and false reassurance) results.

Sensitivity refers to the proportion of individuals who are diagnosed as affected among the total population of affected individuals (true positive divided by true positive plus false negative). With a sensitivity of 90% for anencephaly, 90 will be to the right of the cutoff point and correctly diagnosed, 10 will be to the left of the cutoff point and misdiagnosed. Specificity refers to the proportion of individuals diagnosed as normal over the total population of normal individuals (true negative divided by true negative plus false positive).

Sensitivity and specificity are opposite concepts. If the cutoff point (the dashed line) is moved to the left, to 2 MoM, this would increase the sensitivity by decreasing the number of false negative tests. However, this would lower the specificity by increasing the number of false positives. The national consensus appears to be a cutoff point at 2.5 MoM. This concept of sensitivity and specificity is important in the understanding of the inherent false positives that can lead to increased patient cost and anxiety, and false negatives that can lead to misdiagnosis.

This concept of sensitivity and specificity is important in practically all testing situations. In PKU, where a misdiagnosis has grave consequences, the screening test is set up so that the sensitivity is 98% when the test is performed at two days of age, following a regular diet, and approaches 100% at two to four weeks of age. In contrast, the sensitivity is 84% when the test is done at less than 24 hours of age.

CARRIER TESTS

Carrier testing for a gene disorder has as its primary goal to establish the carrier status of an individual or a couple so that they can exercise reproductive choice. These tests are often directed at particular ethnic groups (e.g., Jews for Tay-Sachs (TS) disease, Yupik Eskimos for congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH)), who by virtue of their ethnic background are at high risk for being carriers of these conditions. Among Ashkenazi Jews, 1 in 30 are carriers for TS; and among the Yupik Eskimos, 1 in 10 are carriers for CAH. Carrier testing is also instigated by a positive family history such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy, fragile X syndrome, or certain chromosomal disorders.

The methods utilized to test for the above conditions include: biochemical tests for Tay-Sachs disease (hexosaminidase A), and congenital adrenal hyperplasia (21 hydroxylase); DNA testing for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (direct DNA mutation analysis), and fragile X syndrome (Southern blot hybridization or PCR); and karyotype analysis for carriers of chromosome abnormalities.

Knowing the carrier status of one or both parents can be critical to reproductive choice. There are a number of options available to couples who carry abnormal genes or chromosomes, including adoption or choosing not to have children. Some couples may choose to have children and take the chance that they will be affected. Others may opt for prenatal diagnosis and pregnancy termination. Some couples may choose prenatal diagnosis so they can make arrangements to deliver at a hospital where immediate treatment is available. Artificial insemination with a normal donor egg or sperm is another option some at-risk couples may choose.

PRESYMPTOMATIC DIAGNOSIS

A third type of genetic testing is presymptomatic diagnosis which has as its primary goal to identify the presence of an abnormal gene in at-risk, but otherwise healthy, adults. These individuals come to clinical attention because of a positive family history of a genetic disorder. A classic example is Huntington disease (HD). HD is an autosomal dominant trait with an average age of onset between the fourth and fifth decades. The gene has been mapped to the short arm of chromosome 4p16.3. The HD gene has also been cloned and the abnormality identified as an expansion of a trinucleotide repeat sequence. The sequence of bases, CAG, is repeated in tandem 11 to 34 times in normal individuals. Thirty-nine or more copies of CAG are present in HD individuals. Individuals at risk can seek presymptomatic diagnosis prior to starting a family.

Presymptomatic diagnosis is also available to families at risk for autosomal dominant breast cancer. Again, these individuals come to clinical attention because of a positive family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer. The BRCA1 breast cancer gene has been identified on chromosome 17q. The gene for BRCA2 is on chromosome 13q. Individuals who carry the abnormal gene have an 80-90% lifetime risk of developing breast/ovarian cancer. Individuals may seek presymptomatic testing so that those carrying the gene can be more vigilant with breast examination and mammography, or alternatively opt for prophylactic mastectomy or oophorectomy. The diagnosis of Huntington disease and breast cancer involves DNA studies which will be discussed in the next section.

Presymptomatic diagnosis and, to a lesser extent, carrier testing, have numerous psychological, social, ethical, legal, and financial repercussions and need to be approached with caution. For this reason, there is a national consensus protocol for presymptomatic diagnosis of Huntington disease. This is a multi-step process requiring four to five clinic visits with involvement by geneticists, psychiatrists, neurologists, psychologists and social workers (Appendix D).

Finally, confirmatory diagnosis is provided to the individuals seeking consultation. This can involve chromosomal, biochemical, or molecular DNA studies, as indicated by the individual cases.

SUMMARY

Some genetic disorders, such as achondroplasia, can be diagnosed based solely on the results of a physical examination. Other disorders are diagnosed because affected individuals have elevated or decreased levels of certain proteins or enzymes. More recently, techniques have been developed to analyze DNA segments and genes.

In addition to establishing a diagnosis, some laboratory tests are used for the purpose of screening the general population and identifying those persons who might benefit from further studies. In serum alpha fetoprotein testing during pregnancy, only women with abnormally high or low levels of MSAFP are referred on for further testing.

In a few cases, tests are available to determine carrier status for a particular recessive genetic condition such as Tay-Sachs disease, CF or fragile X. DNA studies have also been helpful in identifying individuals at risk for adult onset disorders prior to the onset of symptoms.

Carrier testing and presymptomatic diagnosis are not without risks. Verifying a person's carrier status for a particular disease may change his or her outlook on life, family relationships, reproductive choices, employment opportunities, access to insurance, etc.

PRACTICE ACTIVITY 6

1. List 3 reproductive choices available to couples who carry genes coding for
Tay-Sachs disease.

2. List 2 possible drawbacks to presymptomatic testing for Huntington disease.

PRACTICE ACTIVITY 6: ANSWERS

1. The list may include any of the following: not having children, adoption, choosing to have children and taking the chance they will be affected, opting for prenatal diagnosis and terminating a pregnancy with an affected fetus, opting for prenatal diagnosis and preparing to deliver at a hospital where immediate treatment is available, or artificial insemination with a normal donor egg or sperm.

  1. Possible drawbacks to presymptomatic testing for HD include depression because there are no known intervention strategies or cures; possible loss of employment or insurance; loss of hope for a family if the test is positive and the person chooses not to risk passing on the gene; survivor guilt, experienced by the sibs whose test turned out negative; etc.

Table of Contents- Lesson 1) (Next) (Glossary)