Guide to Writing Book Reviews

"A book reviewer occupies a position of special responsibility and trust. He is to summarize, set in context, describe strengths, and point out weaknesses. As a surrogate for us all, he assumes a heavy obligation which it is his duty to discharge with reason and consistency."

- H. G. Rickover


Book reviews perform an important mission for the historical profession by bringing to a book the insight and perspective of another person working in the field. All major professional journals (such as the Journal of American History, Civil War History, and the William and Mary Quarterly) publish reviews. Some devote as much as half of their pages to book reviews and there are journals, such as Reviews in History, which devote their entire contents to them.

Your review should be a finished, polished piece of work. It should be headed by a full bibliographic citation which includes the author's name, the book's title, the place of publication, publisher, date of publication, number of pages, and other contents, such as maps and tables. For example:

William M. Fowler, Jr., Jack Tars & Commodores: The American Navy, 1783-1815 (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1984. Pp. xiii, 318. Illustrations, Maps.)

Keep in mind that a book review is not a book report. A book report merely summarizes the contents of a book while a review provides critical analysis.

Contents of a Good Review

Suggested Procedures

Style and Grammar Reminders

Things to Avoid

 

© James C. Bradford, 1997.
Used by permission of the author.

Return to Home Page